Each architect has a different opinion about ornaments. While some of them don’t care about opinions which against their own opinion, Adolf Loos has a narrow idea about the ornamentation. He defends that ornamentation only results in waste of human labor, money, and materials. Moreover, he adds that ornamentation brings with it the permanent reflections of cultural characteristics that will not be compatible with future versions. “There was a time when the painter and sculptor had a clear idea of their link with the architect: they were all three “visual” artists. The art of the painter and sculptor, however, was imitative of nature: that of the architect was only partially so. Architecture imitated, yes—but imitated culture.” (RYKWERT,1975) Since Architecture is visual, people connect it with beauty or overdesign rather than utility. This misunderstanding leads people to architecture should be mere ornament. However, there is the thin line between a sculpture and a building. A building cannot be replaced easily when ornaments go out of fashion or time.

    Now i understand better, when our instructors reply with "You are not sculptor." when we said " I designed as it is because it is more aesthetic."